Just curious what's acceptable. Was going through some threads, and people are still harping over CK saying his goal was to lock down the state, which I don't believe he's stated since his initial weeks in the job 2 years ago.
How long is it acceptable to point and this statement and point out that he's failed?
Do we keep it up for 15 years if he's here that long?
Just need to know what's acceptable. If he comes out and says "boy, that was setting the bar high and something I'd like to take back" do we continue to point out how he's failed at a goal that literally no one can attain or what?
Thanks in advance. Really looking for a rules clarification here.
How long is it acceptable to point and this statement and point out that he's failed?
Do we keep it up for 15 years if he's here that long?
Just need to know what's acceptable. If he comes out and says "boy, that was setting the bar high and something I'd like to take back" do we continue to point out how he's failed at a goal that literally no one can attain or what?
Thanks in advance. Really looking for a rules clarification here.
Last edited:
