ADVERTISEMENT

Boys, we got screwed. (deserves its own thread)

K-Statriot

All-American performer
Gold Member
Oct 12, 2002
23,664
11,111
113
Tobacco Rd
The ruling on the field was a successful onside kick. The review, of which the sole purpose was to determine if the ruling on the field stood, came back as the ruling on the field stands. So when Riley was aided by our retarded replay board operator who showed over and over that our kicker's Nike bumped the ball off of the rebound from the turf, and then Riley clamored for yet another review, another review should not have been allowed! Sure I know the league quickly responded before HCCK took the podium at his press conference that this was somehow considered a "separate review"... this was not a separate review at all. The review came back originally as "the call on the field stands". Are we to believe that somehow the original review was exclusively just a review about whether the ball went 10 yards untouched? After the ruling on the field was substantiated should we have a separate review to determine if K-State was exclusively blocking downfield before the ball went 10 yards? Should we then have a third review to exclusively determine if the ball was kicked twice by our kicker? What. The. Actual. Fvck?

And lets look at the slippery slope. Lets say all football games were ruled by some favored coach like the BXII refs regard Lincoln Riley. So after a HUGE play that indisputably swings the momentum to the other team, should all coaches be allowed to do reviews after reviews to kill the momentum, regardless of whether the call on the field was correct?!

Boys we got screwed by refs from a conference who they themselves were literally screwed by, when OU and the Whorns bailed for the SEC.

Don't get me started on Landry's catch...
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Member-Only Message Boards

  • Exclusive coverage of Rivals Camp Series

  • Exclusive Highlights and Recruiting Interviews

  • Breaking Recruiting News

Log in or subscribe today