And all about FULL (or BEYOND) disclosure on compliance. Imagine what we would know on this Preston case with John Currie in charge. It would be another opportunity for John Currie to PROMOTE himself and not lookout for the welfare of the student athlete or the basketball program, or it's HC. But, John Currie is not at KU, and the general public will most likely NEVER hear the facts in the Preston case. KU people will never say a word, provide hush money or whatever it takes to make it go away. To me ADJC was the extreme in regards to compliance. On the other hand KU is the opposite extreme. Maybe the new KU Chancellor or the FBI probe will change that. Somewhere in the middle is what it should be, whether it was Currie (at KState), or KU yet today (and the past).
Last edited:
